Taliban minister defends ban on women's university studies

Taliban minister defends ban on women's university studies

The minister of higher education in the Taliban government on Thursday defended his decision to ban women from universities — a decree that had triggered a global backlash.

Discussing the matter for the first time in public, Nida Mohammad Nadim said the ban issued earlier this week was necessary to prevent the mixing of genders in universities and because he believes some subjects being taught violated the principles of Islam. He said the ban was in place until further notice.

In an interview with Afghan television, Nadim pushed back against the widespread international condemnation, including from Muslim-majority countries such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Qatar. Nadim said that foreigners should stop interfering in Afghanistan's internal affairs.

Earlier on Thursday, the foreign ministers of the G-7 group of states urged the Taliban to rescind the ban, warning that "gender persecution may amount to a crime against humanity." The ministers warned after a virtual meeting that "Taliban policies designed to erase women from public life will have consequences for how our countries engage with the Taliban." The G-7 group includes Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union.

A former provincial governor, police chief, and military commander, Nadim was appointed minister in October by the supreme Taliban leader and previously pledged to stamp out secular schooling. Nadim opposes female education, saying it is against Islamic and Afghan values.

Other reasons he gave for the university ban were women's failure to observe a dress code and the study of certain subjects and courses.

"We told girls to have proper hijab, but they didn't, and they wore dresses like they were going to a wedding ceremony," he said. "Girls were studying agriculture and engineering, but this didn't match Afghan culture. Girls should learn, but not in areas against Islam and Afghan honor."

He added that work was underway to fix these issues, and universities would reopen for women once they were resolved. The Taliban made similar promises about high school access for girls, saying classes would resume once "technical issues" around uniforms and transport were sorted out, but girls remain shut out of classrooms.

The Taliban tried to fix what he claimed were problems they inherited from the previous administration since their takeover last year. He alleged that people were not following rules, which justified the university ban.

In Afghanistan, there has been some domestic opposition to the university ban, including from several cricket players. Cricket is a hugely popular sport in the country, and players have hundreds of thousands of followers on social media.

Another show of support for female university students came at Nangarhar Medical University. Local media reported that male students walked out in solidarity and refused to sit for exams until women's university access was reinstated.

Despite initially promising a more moderate rule respecting rights for women and minorities, the Taliban have widely implemented their interpretation of Islamic law, or Sharia, since they seized power in August 2021.

They have banned girls from middle and high school, barred women from most fields of employment, and ordered them to wear head-to-toe clothing in public. Women are also prohibited from parks and gyms. At the same time, while largely traditional, Afghan society has increasingly embraced the education of girls and women over the past two decades.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, speaking to reporters in Washington on Thursday, echoed international opposition to the Taliban decision to ban women from university studies. He said the Taliban will not obtain much-needed improved relations with the world if they "continue on this course."

"What they've done is to try to sentence Afghan women and girls to a dark future without opportunity," he said. "And the bottom line is that no country will be able to succeed, much less thrive, if it denies half its population the opportunity to contribute. And to be clear, we're engaged with other countries on this right now. There is going to be a cost."